tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19678732.post283951232072463748..comments2023-07-31T10:39:53.182-05:00Comments on The Blog of the American Chesterton Society: Feria IV Cinerum: GKC on Ash WednesdayNancy C. Brownhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06169395014931291729noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19678732.post-32891514346376445992010-02-17T19:27:20.966-06:002010-02-17T19:27:20.966-06:00I suppose that you could have meant that, but when...I suppose that you could have meant that, but when I read it I was confused. Anyway, for anyone that may have been confused like me there you go.davymax3https://www.blogger.com/profile/04920344947294561651noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19678732.post-90110890628958763302010-02-17T19:25:21.787-06:002010-02-17T19:25:21.787-06:00Sorry to be a stickler, but your latin is a bit of...Sorry to be a stickler, but your latin is a bit off. Homo does not mean man-as-species as opposed to vir. It means "a human being." Take for instance "fuit homo missus a Deo, cui nomen erat Iohannes." John 1:6 (I think)davymax3https://www.blogger.com/profile/04920344947294561651noreply@blogger.com