Monday, January 05, 2009

When Authors Speak for Themselves: Chesterton included


The Wall Street Journal speaks again about Chesterton, this time he is included in a collection of audio CDs of famous authors who are recorded saying something. Chesterton reportedly speaks on "The Spices of Life":
'G.K. Chesterton, too, comes off well. He starts out with precisely the sort of absurd gambit that one would expect from a writer of his impressive wit: "But while I should resist the suggestion that we must eat beef without mustard," he intones, "I do recognize that there is now a more subtle danger: that men may want to eat mustard without beef." What follows is an amusingly disjointed ramble about the "spices of life."'

Saturday, January 03, 2009

A Blessed Epiphany from G.K. Chesterton

The Wise Men
By G.K. Chesterton
Step softly, under snow or rain,
To find the place where men can pray;
The way is all so very plain
That we may lose the way.

Oh, we have learnt to peer and pore
On tortured puzzles from our youth,
We know all labyrinthine lore,
We are the three wise men of yore,
And we know all things but the truth.

We have gone round and round the hill
And lost the wood among the trees,
And learnt long names for every ill,
And served the mad gods, naming still
The furies the Eumenides.

The gods of violence took the veil
Of vision and philosophy,
The Serpent that brought all men bale,
He bites his own accursed tail,
And calls himself Eternity.

Go humbly…it has hailed and snowed…
With voices low and lanterns lit;
So very simple is the road,
That we may stray from it.

The world grows terrible and white,
And blinding white the breaking day;
We walk bewildered in the light,
For something is too large for sight,
And something much too plain to say.

The Child that was ere worlds begun
(…We need but walk a little way,
We need but see a latch undone…)
The Child that played with moon and sun
Is playing with a little hay.

The house from which the heavens are fed,
The old strange house that is our own,
Where trick of words are never said,
And Mercy is as plain as bread,
And Honour is as hard as stone.

Go humbly, humble are the skies,
And low and large and fierce the Star;
So very near the Manger lies
That we may travel far.

Hark! Laughter like a lion wakes
To roar to the resounding plain.
And the whole heaven shouts and shakes,
For God Himself is born again,
And we are little children walking
Through the snow and rain.

Friday, January 02, 2009

The Defendant on Line

The 'Defences' of which this volume is composed have appeared in The Speaker, and are here reprinted, after revision and amplification, by permission of the Editor. Portions of 'The Defence of Publicity' appeared in The Daily News.

October, 1901.
And "In Defence of a New Edition":
The reissue of a series of essays so ephemeral and even superfluous may seem at the first glance to require some excuse; probably the best excuse is that they will have been completely forgotten, and therefore may be read again with entirely new sensations. I am not sure, however, that this claim is so modest as it sounds, for I fancy that Shakespeare and Balzac, if moved to prayers, might not ask to be remembered, but to be forgotten, and forgotten thus; for if they were forgotten they would be everlastingly re-discovered and re-read. It is a monotonous memory which keeps us in the main from seeing things as splendid as they are. The ancients were not wrong when they made Lethe the boundary of a better land; perhaps the only flaw in their system is that a man who had bathed in the river of forgetfulness would be as likely as not to climb back upon the bank of the earth and fancy himself in Elysium...GKC
Good reading and a great on line resource. The Defendant, by GK Chesterton, on line here.

H/T: Stacie, thanks.

Thursday, January 01, 2009

January One

Happy Octave of Christmas and a Blessed 2009 to all our readers!

God willing I shall continue to write - at least from time to time - here or elsewhere - but to start the year on a Thursday, hm.... such possibilities present themselves. And there's so much to say about Christmas and about New Year's - you might even combine the two as in the mystical poem New Years Chimes by Francis Thompson... The one Is is... oh, yes. What is the song the stars sing? Yes, yes. Get out the star charts, people.

Ahem. Really, however, we ought to start off the year with some Chesterton - and here's the perfect essay for the day.

God bless you in 2009 and always!

Dr. Thursday


"January One"
From GKC's Lunacy and Letters

Last night as I heard the New Year bells go like great guns in the darkness, I made a New Year resolution, which consisted of forty-eight sections, forty-six of which are intensely interesting, but do not concern the reader. The last two may possibly be of public interest, because I intend to break them. They were (1) that, heaven helping me, I would not write about the New Year; (2) that I would not write about anything else, but retire to a monastery of my own religion, which is not yet quite what you could call founded. These were exaggerations, born of that exhilaration which is greater than the exhilaration of light, the living exhilaration of darkness. Daylight is in many ways an illusion, since it makes us feel that the secret of things is a long way off; darkness makes us feel that it is very close.

In the dark I feel as if I were a savage. The one result on my mind as a result of reading recent studies of savage worship, is that savages are sensible whoever else isn't. I feel, I say, like a reasonable philosophical savage who has not allowed a mechanical chatter of words to rob him of his natural and delightful ecstasy, of his natural and delightful terror. I feel like a savage who believed that a bear of enormous size had made the stars, and that this bear had suddenly taken a fancy to him personally and embraced him. So much for how I feel in the dark.

New Years and such things are extraordinarily valuable. They are arbitrary divisions of time; they are a sudden and ceaseless cutting in two of time. But when we have an endless serpent in front of us, what can we do but cut it in two? Time is apparently endless, and it is beyond all question a serpent. The real reason why times and seasons and feasts and anniversaries arose is because this serpent of time would otherwise drag his slow length along over all our impressions, and there would be no opportunity of sharply realising the change from one impression to another. So far from interruptions being in their nature bad for our aesthetic feelings, an interruption is in its nature good. It would be an exceedingly good thing if we had the dread of such an interruption constantly before us when we are enjoying anything. It would be good if we expected a bell to ring towards the end of a sunset. It would be good if we thought the clock might strike while we were in the perfect pleasure of staring at sea and sky. Such a sudden check would bring all our impressions into an intense and enjoyable compass, would make the vast sky a single sapphire, the vast sea a single emerald. After long experience of the glories of sensation men find that it is necessary to put to our feelings this perfect artistic limit. And after a little longer experience they find that the God in whom they hardly believe has, as the perfect artist, put the perfect artistic limit - death.

Death is a time limit; but differs in many ways from New Year's Day. The divisions of time which men have adopted are in a sort of way a mild mortality. When we see the Old Year out, we do what many eminent men have done, and what all men desire to do; we die temporarily. Whenever we admit that it is Tuesday we fulfil St. Paul, and die daily. I doubt if the strongest stoic that ever existed on earth could endure the idea of a Tuesday following on a Tuesday, and a Tuesday on that, and a Tuesday on that, and all the days being Tuesdays till the Day of Judgment, which might be (by some strange and special mercy) a Wednesday.

The divisions of time are arranged so that we may have a start or shock at each reopening of the question. The object of a New Year is not that we should have a new year. It is that we should have a new soul and a new nose; new feet, a new backbone, new ears, and new eyes. It is that we should look out instantaneously on an impossible earth; that we should think it very odd that grass should be green instead of being reasonably purple; that we should think it almost unintelligible that a lot of straight trees should grow out of the round world instead of a lot of round world growing out of the straight trees. The object of the cold and hard definitions of time is almost exactly the same as those of the cold and hard definitions of theology; it is to wake people up. Unless a particular man made New Year resolutions, he would make no resolutions. Unless a man starts afresh about things, he will certainly do nothing effective. Unless a man starts on the strange assumption that he has never existed before, it is quite certain that he will never exist afterwards. Unless a man be born again, he shall by no means enter into the Kingdom of Heaven.

Of such dramatic renascences New Year's Day is the great example. Doubtless this division of time can be described as an artificiality; but doubtless also it can be described more correctly, as a great artificial thing ought always to be described - that is, as one of the great masterpieces of man. Man has, as I have urged in the case of religion, perceived with a tolerable accuracy his own needs. He has seen that we tend to tire of the most eternal splendours, and that a mark on our calendar, or a crash of bells at midnight maybe, reminds us that we have only recently been created. Let us make New Year resolutions, but not only resolutions to be good. Also resolutions to notice that we have feet, and thank them (with a courtly bow) for carrying us.

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Happy New Year!

Wishing you and your families and friends the best of everything in the new year. Peace, joy, prosperity and happiness in 2009!

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Prayers for the Gilbert Magazine family

Please pray for our Gilbert magazine family. A few of our members are experiencing difficult situations, and so we ask you to join us in praying for them. Thank you.

Monday, December 29, 2008

Wall Street Journal on Chesterton: A Century of 'Thursday's

The Wall Street Journal printed a fairly big article on our man GKC on Saturday, Dec. 28th, 2008. Titled: A Century of Thursdays: G.K. Chesterton dismissed his own book as 'moonshine', but it endures by Allen Barra, whom, I'm told is an American Chesterton Society member (go Allen!).

I read it yesterday when my spouse brought home a photo copy from the library, and I thought it was extremely good. After reading the latest Gilbert, I was kind of waiting for the shoe (of anti-Semite) to drop, but it never did. Yeah, Allen Barra, yeah WSJ! And yeah Randy Jones, too, who conjured up a new Chesterton caricature for the piece (check it out, it's great).

Dale Ahlquist, our intrepid leader, hopes this might pave the way for a WSJ article on our annual conference. Apparently they were there last year, interviewed a bunch of people, but then never produced an article. Oh well, things happen in the journalistic world.

Barra was good, quoted nicely and accurately, brought out some great points, linked it into the current presidency and the past election campaign, writing a nice, succinct and wide ranging (appropriately Chestertonian) article.

If you like the article, you can write to Mr. Barra, his email is listed at the end of the article. Even journalists like to hear some positive feedback every once in a while ;-)

UPDATE: I just tried emailing Mr. Barra, and it bounced, so I hope he finds this on his own.

NRO Interviews Father Brown (as played by Kevin O'Brien)


Kevin O'Brien was recently interviewed by John Miller of National Review Online, and it's quite interesting. Listen here.

Saturday, December 27, 2008

Chesterton and the Jews

My new issue of Gilbert Magazine came the other day, and it's a large issue (over sized because it combines November and December's issues) devoted to the unfortunate myth of Chesterton's reported view of Jews being negative.

This was recently dragged into the public square again, when the New Yorker magazine ran an article that favorably recorded the fact that this was the 100th anniversary year of the publication of Orthodoxy, but then trotted out the old myth as a way of sort of dismissing Chesterton's genius at anything. Our President, Dale Ahlquist, sent this response to the New Yorker, but it was, sadly, never published.

So, the Chesterton group decided that if the New Yorker wouldn't publish it, Gilbert would, with additional support from anyone who has anything to say about Chesterton and Jews. Which, naturally, a lot of us did.

After spending several days reading this large issue, I have to say that it would be the perfect resource for anyone needing to defend Chesterton against the charges of being an anti-Semite. For those in the future finding this blog post, it is Gilbert Magazine, Volume 12, Numbers 2 & 3, the November/December 2008 issue.

Friday, December 26, 2008

The Flying Stars is Quoted!

I got my Christmas issue of Gilbert (we'll talk about this fantastic issue later) and I find myself quoted (twice!) on the internet. First, by Kathy Shaidle, at Five Feet of Fury, where she is quoting another blogger, The Other McCain: Unspeakable Truth, Mandatory Lies who read the latest Gilbert.

Both of them picked up on my opening paragraph of my latest The Flying Stars column, titled: An Author Accused:
Our current culture holds the twin paradoxical views that racial diversity is gloriously wonderful, but racial descriptions of individuals are taboo. Celebrating diversity is good; describing diversity is bad. We should acknowledge that people are of different races and be glad, but not glad enough to wonder what those races are.
Which is cool, thanks both of you!

Thursday, December 25, 2008

Merry Christmas from the American Chesterton Society

The American Chesterton Society and the American Chesterton Society Blog would like to wish you and yours a very Happy, Holy, and Blessed Christmas, and any other religious holiday you are celebrating. God bless us, everyone!

Wednesday, December 24, 2008

Christmas Issue of Gilbert

One of the most interesting articles, containing a lot of humor, too, in the latest Gilbert magazine was Kevin O'Brien's account of his experiences as EWTN filming various things for the ACS and his own hew show (isn't that exciting!): Theater of the Word Incorporated. Not Theater of the Word, Inc, mind you. Think, the Word in-CORPorated.

Anyway, it was fun to see the pictures of the episodes, and hear the stories of the filming. My daughter picked up on Ashley Ahlquist's name (I had missed the "Reverand" in front of the "Doctor") and of course the famous Stanford Nutting, whom you can see on YouTube, but don't have your coffee cup in your hand or you'll risk spillage due to laughter.

Have a very Merry Christmas, drive safely, and keep warm.

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

Chesterton on Santa Claus: New York Times Dec. 22, 1912

In this book review (which I've never seen before), Chesterton defends Santa, and concludes:
...the only test of whether he is genuine is whether he is recognized.
In this article, which comes up, I'm sorry to say, as a pdf and more like a picture file than a word file, Chesterton is reviewing a book by S.R. Littlewood, The Story of Santa Claus. Apparently, Chesterton has mainly disagreed with the author, and seeks to inform us of that fact.
The third point is more obvious, but even more neglected; here it need only be mentioned to correct what has gone before. It should always be remembered that dogmatic and authoristative religious spend much of their time rather in restraining superstitions than in encouraging them, and that such enthusiasms as that which Protestants call "Mariolatry" generally display all the merits and defects of widespread democratic movements. If saints, such as St. Nicholas of the Children, do not exist, they were not a priestly deception, but an erroneous public opinion.
I hope you can download this and use AdobeReader to read it all, because it's great.

H/T/: Deb L. and Bob C.

Monday, December 22, 2008

Danny Gospel

This book was recommended by Dale Ahlquist in a recent issue of Gilbert Magazine. I thought I'd check it out for you. If you've read it, please comment below.
Danny Gospel Danny Gospel by David Athey

My review

rating: 5 of 5 stars
As an answer to the recent question, "Why can't someone write a good book about someone suffering a tragedy who gets through it by having normal everyday encounters with family, friends, and strangers, who overcomes the situation with grace, and not by visiting an imaginary shack where he hallucinates about talking to God the Father (an African American woman), God the Son and God the Holy Spirit with an occasional appearance of Holy Wisdom, not a fourth person of the Trinity?", Danny Gospel is a wonderful book.

Danny, like the main character in The Shack, suffers terrible tragedies and must deal with death. Danny, like the main character in The Shack, has a car accident near the end of the book. Danny, unlike the main character in The Shack, has to deal with this sadness of life by normal everyday encounters with people.

Danny Gospel is the reminder that although Jesus is Lord and Savior, He isn't walking the earth anymore. Through a life of prayer, direction and help come in the physical contacts of everyday life: through friends, neighbors, brothers, and even strangers.

Danny is a lot like St. Francis of Assisi, and especially G.K. Chesterton's biography of the saint as a confusing jumble of ascetic/stigmatist and singer of songs to birds. Danny is a singer who fasts, too. And, like St. Francis, he is an extremely likeable, if at times complicated, person.

Danny Gospel is a compelling story. Once getting to know Danny, one's curiosity is piqued to keep finding out what was going to happen next.

Looking for an alternative to The Shack? Looking for a good book to read this week in particular, but any week would do? Looking for a book where the main character suffers a tragedy, but figures out, through friends and strangers, how to live again? How to forgive? How to really love? Read Danny Gospel. I think you'll like it.
View all my reviews.

Saturday, December 20, 2008

WSJ Opinion: There Is a God

Thanks, Dave, for sending this article.
"He isn't real, is he?"

Perhaps a more responsible parent would confess, but I hesitate. For this I blame G.K. Chesterton, whose treatise "Orthodoxy" had its 100th anniversary this year. One of its themes is the violence that rationalistic modernism has worked on the valuable idea of a "mystical condition," which is to say the mystery inherent in a supernaturally created world. Writing of his path to faith in God, Chesterton says: "I had always believed that the world involved magic: now I thought that perhaps it involved a magician.

Merry Christmas from Kevin O'Brien

H/T: Theater of the Word

Funny: Watch the dog. As Kevin gets more animated, the dog jumps, settles, jumps again, and finally leaves. I guess he had too much consumerism for one day ;-)

Friday, December 19, 2008

Wish I Lived in Greensboro--Don't You?

Fascinating article about a Chestertonian Christmas event in Greensboro, NC.

NEW -- The Chesterton Review General Index from 1974 - 2008 REVISED


The Chesterton Review has put out a new edition of their Index, and I would think any Chestertonian academic or scholar would be interested to have this information on hand, if not to own, at least to know it is available.

H/T: Peter F.

Thursday, December 18, 2008

GKC's Christmas Paragraph in Orthodoxy

Today, December 18, is the second of the "Greater Feria", the grand Christmas countdown which the Church (like a little child) uses in her delight and anticipation for the great feast. I had debated whether to suspend our study of Orthodoxy - and then I was delighted to see what is in the very next paragraph! Oh the delight of being Thursday! (hee hee) I could not have planned it better - but then I did not plan it at all.

For this next paragraph - yes, finally - this is the great paragraph of Orthodoxy! The one everyone quotes, and misquotes. It gives us the two important truths about the "two paths" we must choose from: the path of light, or the path of darkness, which today shall go by another name - the name which is the other opposite of "light".

Ever since Christianity freed science from the slavery of the eternal cycles and from the ridiculous view that the "heavens" (the place of the sun, moon, planets and stars, not the place of God) used a different set of laws - if they used laws at all - physicists have been struggling to understand how things move. In the last few decades, we have gotten to a view of four main "forces" which govern the motion of all things. Two (the strong nuclear and the weak nuclear) govern subatomic particles and hold the nucleus of atoms together. The electromagnetic is the one we most often deal with in our lives: not only does it make computers and cars work, but simpler things like holding our bodies together, keeping lions in cages, and stuff like that - for it governs how atoms interact with each other. Finally, the most mysterious force - the hardest to study, but one which we also experience continually (unless we are astronauts) - the force of gravity, which governs how collections of atoms interact, and governs both the smallest grains of sand and the great collections of galaxies.

And though everyone tends to forget - unless one is reading these columns - it is the force of Christmas. But you will think it merely a pun. It may be a pun. But it happens to be true, and if you want to turn and become like little children for this feast when God Himself became a little children, you have to understand this next paragraph - if you never read any other paragraph of Orthodoxy - or of Chesterton.

((When you are ready to turn, click here))

The mystery to be revealed here is a stunning revelation of what might be called "angelology" - the study of the pure spirits or "angels". It is important to realize we actually know something about angels! GKC pointed that out in a hilarious way in a famous Christmas essay, and I will give you a little more of it than I usually quote:
Meanwhile, it remains true that I shall eat a great deal of turkey this Christmas; and it is not in the least true (as the vegetarians say) that I shall do it because I do not realise what I am doing, or because I do what I know is wrong, or that I do it with shame or doubt or a fundamental unrest of conscience. In one sense I know quite well what I am doing; in another sense I know quite well that I know not what I do. Scrooge and the Cratchits and I are, as I have said, all in one boat; the turkey and I are, to say the most of it, ships that pass in the night, and greet each other in passing. I wish him well; but it is really practically impossible to discover whether I treat him well. I can avoid, and I do avoid with horror, all special and artificial tormenting of him, sticking pins in him for fun or sticking knives in him for scientific investigation. But whether by feeding him slowly and killing him quickly for the needs of my brethren, I have improved in his own solemn eyes his own strange and separate destiny, whether I have made him in the sight of God a slave or a martyr, or one whom the gods love and who die young - that is far more removed from my possibilities of knowledge than the most abstruse intricacies of mysticism or theology. A turkey is more occult and awful than all the angels and archangels. In so far as God has partly revealed to us an angelic world, he has partly told us what an angel means. But God has never told us what a turkey means. And if you go and stare at a live turkey for an hour or two, you will find by the end of it that the enigma has rather increased than diminished.
[GKC ILN Jan 4 1908 CW28:20-21]
Yes, God has told us a little. And now - Chesterton will use that little to tell us a little more. You will think this all verbal fireworks, or all puns, or all nonsense. Oh, no. It is deep philosophy - it is as savory as a stuffed turkey, as pleasing and pungent as fresh and decorated pines - for it is ontology the science of being itself. But sit down, pour yourself something to drink, put on some Christmas lights, and read:
It is one of the hundred answers to the fugitive perversion of modern "force" that the promptest and boldest agencies are also the most fragile or full of sensibility. The swiftest things are the softest things. A bird is active, because a bird is soft. A stone is helpless, because a stone is hard. The stone must by its own nature go downwards, because hardness is weakness. The bird can of its nature go upwards, because fragility is force. In perfect force there is a kind of frivolity, an airiness that can maintain itself in the air. Modern investigators of miraculous history have solemnly admitted that a characteristic of the great saints is their power of "levitation." They might go further; a characteristic of the great saints is their power of levity. Angels can fly because they can take themselves lightly. This has been always the instinct of Christendom, and especially the instinct of Christian art. Remember how Fra Angelico represented all his angels, not only as birds, but almost as butterflies. Remember how the most earnest mediaeval art was full of light and fluttering draperies, of quick and capering feet. It was the one thing that the modern Pre-raphaelites could not imitate in the real Pre-raphaelites. Burne-Jones could never recover the deep levity of the Middle Ages. In the old Christian pictures the sky over every figure is like a blue or gold parachute. Every figure seems ready to fly up and float about in the heavens. The tattered cloak of the beggar will bear him up like the rayed plumes of the angels. But the kings in their heavy gold and the proud in their robes of purple will all of their nature sink downwards, for pride cannot rise to levity or levitation. Pride is the downward drag of all things into an easy solemnity. One "settles down" into a sort of selfish seriousness; but one has to rise to a gay self-forgetfulness. A man "falls" into a brown study; he reaches up at a blue sky. Seriousness is not a virtue. It would be a heresy, but a much more sensible heresy, to say that seriousness is a vice. It is really a natural trend or lapse into taking one's self gravely, because it is the easiest thing to do. It is much easier to write a good Times leading article than a good joke in Punch. For solemnity flows out of men naturally; but laughter is a leap. It is easy to be heavy: hard to be light. Satan fell by the force of gravity.
[CW1:325-6]
Yes, there it is. The famous "toucan" line, in all its splendour and its exquisite setting of ontological context! Let us say it together, just to try to learn its correct form:
Angels can fly because they can take themselves lightly.
It's called the toucan quote because it contains two "can"s. (hee hee) But we must not lose sight of its corollary line, which we also need to have at our disposal:
Satan fell by the force of gravity.
I have said before that one of Chesterton's greatest sustained demonstrations in all his writing has been on the dangers of PRIDE. There is this insight, written long before his conversion to Roman Catholicism:
Now, one of these very practical and working mysteries in the Christian tradition, and one which the Roman Catholic Church, as I say, has done her best work in singling out, is the conception of the sinfulness of pride. Pride is a weakness in the character; it dries up laughter, it dries up wonder, it dries up chivalry and energy.
[GKC Heretics CW1:107]
There too we see how one of the effects of pride is to remove humour and delight - to dry up laughter. But our paragraph doesn't simply warn us of what not to do. It tells us what we ought to do. We ought to take ourselves lightly. I ought to quote his entire famous essay in The Common Man, "If I Only Had One Sermon to Preach" - but I shall just give you the essential. In trying to explain the difficulties of terminology, GKC gives the scene of a pompous prideful braggart who enters a homely and popular pub - and gives the reactions of the Common Man to this visitor:
"He comes in here and he thinks he's God Almighty."
To which GKC appends "The man in the pub has precisely repeated, word for word, the theological formula about Satan." That is what it means to think too much of ourselves!

But those of us who can remember, as the good angels remember, that we are not God - and in fact are quite insignificant in the universe - well, then we can take ourselves lightly... and perhaps we too will fly up to join the choir which sang at the Birthday In the Cave.

One of the things we might do to recover that light and childline sense - on Christmas especially - is to remember to play - and I don't mean football or video games - or even board games. But silly games, simple, family games. Dickens himself linked these ideas:
After a while they played at forfeits; for it is good to be children sometimes, and never better than at Christmas, when its mighty Founder was a child himself.
[Charles Dickens, Stave 3, A Christmas Carol]
No I am not going to give you the rules for "forfeits" or even "Hunt the Slipper" which comes up in Chesterton. Instead you might try a couple of rounds of Gype, which means you will have to make up the rules first, which is even better. How you do it is your choice, but you ought to think about taking yourself lightly, even if you for some reason cannot field a Gype Team this year. (hee hee!)

Why do I think this is the most perfect paragraph for Christmas? Not only because we ought to laugh in this season, not only because of the angels who sing, and the demons who cower at the glory from the cave. No, those are true, but it is more human than that. Because it reveals the whoe reason for the season - the Protoevangelion, the words which Satan heard pronounced to Eve, that there would be One Who Would Come To Crush The Enemy.... again and again GKC is trying to remind us, there was this thing called "the Fall" - whcih is as Christmas as one can get. No wonder we put a Tree in our house... the Tree of Life.

And then, in the fullness of time, God decided to show us a mystery of a force greater than gravity, one which could pull Him out of heaven, and down to Earth:

"And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us." [John 1:14]



Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Chesterton in Sight and Sound

H/T: Bob C.

This YouTube video contains more audio than I've heard before. The part that was new to me was the Canadian Literary Luncheon for Rudyard Kipling. I'd read that before, but never heard it.

Highlight: Hearing Chesterton laughing at his own humorous jokes–always a pleasure.