Monday, December 31, 2007

Happy New Year's Eve!

Dropping the ball - two kinds

A short and very curious pair of quotes, relative to tonight's activity. One from Chesterton and one from 155 years ago. Let this simple synchronization of our world's clocks not obscure the name-day of our Lord and the solemn feast of Mary's maternity.

Thanks for taking time to be Chestertonian during 2007. Let us all strive to follow our Aunt Frances and Uncle Gilbert more closely, as they lead us on to Jesus Christ, the Everlasting Man.

I shall leave you with a quote from the Paschal Vigil, a fitting prayer to mark off the boundaries of time:

Christus heri et hodie
Principium et Finis
Alpha et Omega
Ipsius sunt tempora et saecula
Ipsi gloria et imperium
per universa aeternitatis saecula.
Amen.


Christ yesterday and today,
The Beginning and the End,
The Alpha and the Omega,
His are the times and the ages,
To Him be glory and dominion
Through the universe of unending ages.
Amen.

--Dr. Thursday
Remember, however, that to be breakable is not the same as to be
perishable. Strike a glass, and it will not endure an instant; simply do
not strike it, and it will endure a thousand years. Such, it seemed, was
the joy of man, either in elfland or on earth; the happiness depended on
which you could at any moment do and which, very
often, it was not obvious why you should not do. Now, the point here is
that to me this did not seem unjust. ... If Cinderella says, "How
is it that I must leave the ball at twelve?" her godmother might answer,
"How is it that you are going there till twelve?"
[GKC, Orthodoxy CW1:260]


One of the latest applications of the electric telegraph is at once
useful and beautiful. It is a plan for distributing and correcting mean
Greenwich time in London and over the country every day at noon. Every
holiday-maker knows the ball which surmounts the Royal Observatory, and has watched with interest its descent as the clock gave the first stroke
of noon, thereby telling the sea-going men in the river the exact state
of the chronometers to which they have to trust over the pathless
waters. Such a ball has been raised on a pole on the Telegraph Office,
near Charing Cross, and at noon each day is to drop by electric action
simultaneously with that of Greenwich, and falling on a cushion at the
base of the pole, is to communicate standard time along all the
telegraphic wires of the country. At the same instant the exact period
of noon will be known at the most distant as well as the less remote
places in the country; and it is said that all the Railway Companies
have agreed to avail themselves of these means of obtaining an exact
uniformity of time.
[Our Iron Roads by Frederick S. Williams (This history of the
development and status of Britain's railroads was published in 1852.)]

Thank you Dr. Thursday, for this and all your "Thursday" posts in 2007.

Saturday, December 29, 2007

Gilbert Editor Update

Sean is improving, thanks for the prayers, and please continue, as he has surgery yet to look forward to.

Friday, December 28, 2007

Information on obtaining "The Surprise" (EWTN edition) on DVD

I don’t know too many details, but I do know that “The Surprise” will be available on DVD from the EWTN Religious Catalogue at some point in the near future. You will be able to order it by visiting the website: http://www.ewtnreligiouscatalogue.com/ or by calling toll free: 1-800-854-6316.
This information from Emily, who works at EWTN. Thanks, Emily!

Whoever notices first that the DVD is available, please let everyone know!

Attention Poets: Blog Poetry Contest

Sheila, at My Enchiridion, is conducting a poetry contest in honor of Christmas.

She, like Chesterton, prefers poems that rhyme. Although she doesn't mind free verse as long as it isn't completely random.

You may submit up to three poems.

Sheila The Famous, is also known for her Triolet Contest last year, which resulted in many good and popular triolets. Some of which received the honor of publication in Gilbert Magazine, after being published on My Enchiridion.

Now, let's get those creative juices going and make some Christmas poetry!

Thursday, December 27, 2007

Please Pray for Sean

The editor of Gilbert Magazine, Sean Dailey, was unexpectedly and suddenly admitted to the hospital today for an infection which needed immediate treatment. Please join us in praying for his speedy recovery.

Thank you.

Merry Christmas from Dr. Thursday

Celebrating Christmas - and the Year-Boundary

Today, the Third day of Christmas, is also the feast of St. John, the Apostle and Evangelist. It was amazing this morning at Holy Mass to hear the gospel, which is about as far from shepherds, Magi, and the infant in the manger as one might find: "Early in the morning of the first the day of the week... Peter ran to the tomb, but the Disciple-Whom-Jesus-Loved ran faster... he saw, and believed." (see John 20; my paraphrase) I wish to say something, but I shall first preface it with a Chesterton quote to attempt to indicate something about my tone here:
"I'm very fond of strong Protestants," said Father Brown. "I came to you because I was sure you would tell the truth."
[GKC, "The Chief Mourner of Marne" in The Secret Of Father Brown
It is unfortunate that we who love Jesus should find a division here, but it is a real division, and needs to be acknowledged - if we ever hope to abolish it (cf. GKC on fences in The Thing CW3:157) - and this will require all interested Christians to tell the truth. Which I shall here strive to do, with God's help. Read more.

The simple thing is that at Christmas, as on every other day of the year, Catholics are always bringing the stark reality of the Cross into bold uncompromising view - by the simple celebration of Holy Mass, the centerpiece of which begins "On the day before He suffered, He took bread..." It is not simply doing what St. Paul restricts himself to do "I determined when I was with you I would speak of nothing but Jesus Christ, and Him crucified." [see 1Cor2:2] This may be "absurdity to Greeks and stumbling block for Jews" [1Cor1:23] - and something forbidden by tradition for some others. But it happens to be what Jesus told the Apostles to do "Do this in remembrance of Me." and "Teach them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you." [Lk 22:19, Mt 28:20]

But I know I am saying this very poorly. Really it is not my intention to "argue" (in any sense) nor to ride rough-shod over other religions. It is rather my attempt to observe the curious truth that GKC pointed out and which we examined in our previous studies:
Herod had his place, therefore, in the miracle play of Bethlehem because he is the menace to the Church Militant and shows it from the first as under persecution and fighting for its life. For those who think this a discord, it is a discord that sounds simultaneously with the Christmas bells. For those who think the idea of the Crusade is one that spoils the idea of the Cross, we can only say that for them the idea of the Cross is spoiled; the idea of the Cross is spoiled quite literally in the Cradle.
[GKC The Everlasting Man CW2:314]
Let me try again - and again I preface it with my respect for those who differ from me in their heritage: A Catholic (by virtue of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass - which is why we call it Christ-MASS) is forced to approach the Christmas Cradle full of the awareness that this Baby was born in order to DIE:
...the life of Jesus went as swift and straight as a thunderbolt. It was above all things dramatic; it did above all things consist in doing something that had to be done. It emphatically would not have been done if Jesus had walked about the world for ever doing nothing except tell the truth. And even the external movement of it must not be described as a wandering in the sense of forgetting that it was a journey. This is where it was a fulfilment of the myths rather than of the philosophies; it is a journey with a goal and an object, like Jason going to find the Golden Fleece, or Hercules the golden apples of the Hesperides. The gold that he was seeking was death. The primary thing that he was going to do was to die. [see Mt 16:21, Lk 12:49-50] He was going to do other things equally definite and objective; we might almost say equally external and material. But from first to last the most definite fact is that he is going to die.
[GKC, The Everlasting Man CW2:339]
Hence, Christmas is celebrated with His own death in stark view - we celebrate the Birth first and foremost by the ritual commemoration of the Death. This is not an argument for a "better" or a "worse" method. It is a comment on a strange reality.

Because, as most all Christians know, God's "secret plan" [cf. Rom 16:25-6] was for God to become Man in order to die - and by dying, destroy death. St Paul lectured on this: "Know you not that all we who are baptized in Christ Jesus are baptized in his death? For we are buried together with him by baptism into death: that, as Christ is risen from the dead by the glory of the Father, so we also may walk in newness of life. For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection." [Romans 6:3-5] And it's even in that carol: "Mild He lays His glory by, born that Man no more may die." Let all Christians here find an even greater cause to rejoice at Christmas - and paraphrase St. Paul: if Christ be not born, our faith is in vain.

But let us recall, as GKC recalls very strongly in his preface to our reference text, that the consideration of Jesus Christ the Everlasting Man is not intended to pick at conflicts between various forms of Christians, but to reveal the stark division between Christianity and "the world" of pagans. You can see CW2:141 for details, but let me (just for a change) quote something else, because I have some more to say, and this will lead us into the topic:
There is nothing really wrong with the whole modern world except that it does not fit in with Christmas. The modern world will have to fit in with Christmas or die. Those who will not rejoice in the end of the year must be condemned to lament it. We must accept the New Year as a new fact; we must be born again. No kind of culture or literary experience can save him who entirely refuses this cold bath of winter ecstasy. No poetry can be appreciated by him who cannot appreciate the mottoes in the crackers. No log-rolling can rescue him who will not roll the Yule log. Christmas is like death and child-birth - a test of our simple virtue; and there is no other such test left in this land to-day.
[GKC ILN Jan 9 1909 CW28:251]
Yes - death, division, Christmas - and rebirth and the New Year - which just happens to also be the Octave-day of Christmas, and the day on which Jesus was given His most holy name. [see Luke 2:21, cf. Lev 12:3-8]

Over on her own blogg, our esteemed bloggmistress Nancy Brown points out two important facts:

1. "...we keep on celebrating..."

This is important. This year, even areas which transfer Epiphany to Sunday shall celebrate Epiphany on January 6. Therefore, we shall have a precise Twelve Days of Christmas. Perhaps we can call it "Extraordinary" time, hee hee.

2. "...the thing that's brought us all together, whether anyone wants to admit it or not, is the birth of Jesus 2000 years ago..."

This is even more important. No one - whether Christian or not, whether recognizing Christ as historical or not, whether celebrating birthdays or not - indeed, no one, regardless of religious or philosophical inclination, can escape this simple fact of calendar. The very years are numbered and fixed upon Christmas. (NOT on Easter, as curious as that is. Though perhaps another time we shall consider the possibility that Good Friday fell on March 25...)

Yes, fixed upon Christmas. Perhaps we could call that milestone, or marking point in time, a "virtual" or (more properly) a reference Christmas, somewhat like the reference circles like the Equator, or the Greenwich Meridian, or (even more exotic) like the Aries Point when the Sun crosses the celestial equator and begins Spring in the Northern Hemisphere. Few people live ON the equator, and those who do cannot really see it. And yet it is still there. People buy and sell two-by-fours, even though those are not the precise dimensions of that piece of lumber.

In the same way few at that time actually knew of Christ's birth (despite the efforts, as we saw last week, of the Heavenly Host, and some talkative shepherds!) Then, somehow along the way, the year-count got just slightly garbled early on, and it seems certain that Jesus was actually born a few years B.C. (Before Christ!) But that birth was a known date, and one which was "not all that long ago". It wasn't some long-past half-myth, like "the year of the Founding of the City" (A.U.C.) for the ancient Romans. It was a known moment in time. It has been ignored, has been forgotten, and even now is being denied. And yet for all of us, regardless of belief, the very Earth Time itself is measured based on this singular reference mark: the Birth of Jesus in the Cave of Bethlehem.

If there was any doubt of this, there would have been some radical change arising from the fears voiced as if by the whiney tone of the Cold One (algor is Latin for cold), back in the late 1990s. Yes, back then, Total Doom for the technical world was forecast when the cosmic odometer rolled over as 23:59:59 on December 31, 1999 became 00:00:00 on January 1, 2000. Some of us techies had some good laughs reading about how vacuum cleaners, and toasters would malfunction, and door hinges would no longer rotate, and glue and nails would lose their grip, and so on. Ah, it was funny.

Of course, as you may already know, the Total Doom was warded off. I had a whole bulb of garlic on my computer, and by the MAGIC of the INTERNET, the goodness of garlic seeped out, and so the comet Y2K, also called Eetook, was kept away from us. If you need more information, or are worried about another form of imminent disaster, see here for all the details. Recipes are not included.

So, whether you eat garlic or sit it on your computers, I do hope you will continue to celebrate the Twelve Days of Christmas properly. We get the authentic 12 this year - take advantage of it! Keep celebrating!

The next Thursday we shall meet (God willing) will be in 2008. So let us conclude with another remark from Uncle Gilbert:
Civilisation is simply that self-command by which man can revert to the normal. Anarchy is not uproar; uproar is all right in its place. Anarchy is not plunging; anarchy is not being able to stop. It is not anarchy in a house if people sit up all night on New Year's Eve. It is anarchy in a house if this makes them sit up later and later every night afterwards. It is not anarchy in the State if men under extreme misgovernment drag down their existing rulers, and substitute other rulers and obey them. It is anarchy in a State if people come to think that all things, small and great, may, in varying degrees, be so resisted; that whenever the postal service annoys me, I may break the rules of the post-office. Civilisation does permit outbreak; it does not permit anarchy...
[GKC ILN Nov 23 1912 CW29:394]
Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!

--Dr. Thursday

PS. Here is an amazing, and timely poem which I posted back in my own blogging days. It is one of my favourites.

Another PS. It is well-known that our current time is labelled A.D., standing for Anno Domini, Latin for "Year of the Lord". And we English speakers write "B.C." the initials of "Before Christ" meaning the other side of the time axis. But I wondered how - say - Aquinas, or a Papal encyclical - would refer to "B.C." Do you know? After some exploration I found out. The Latin for "Before Christ" is Ante Christum, hence the abbreviation is "A.C." If you know of a good joke - or even better, a good mystery - connected with this, please let me know.

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

A Message to the ACS from EWTN re: The Surprise

Hello to all at the American Chesterton Society!

I work at EWTN and was counting the days until we aired “The Surprise!” My whole family watched the movie on Friday night, then again on Christmas Eve. (We switched the TV on to let my five year old brother see some Christmas programming, but he said “No! I want to see ‘The Surprise’ again;” wouldn’t G.K. be proud?) Chesterton is such an amazing author, the dialogue was so wonderful and thought provoking- I’m sure I will catch something new every time I see it! The play was brought to life by such wonderful acting talent as well! A standing ovation to Kevin O’Brien, Miss. Ahlquist and “the author” especially- though everyone’s performance deserves a big round of applause! How appropriate for Christmas too, with the amazing line “What have you done with my play- I’m coming down!” It truly brought the message of the Incarnation to my mind, and helped me realize that God came down to this earth to save us.

I want to thank everyone for the hard work they did to bring this story to life! We all had a wonderful surprise this Christmas in “The Surprise!”


Many Blessings,

Emily Lunsford
EWTN Media Missionaries Support Assistant
UPDATE: Just to clarify, Emily wrote on behalf of herself and her family. She happens to work at EWTN. ;-)

Monday, December 24, 2007

Merry Christmas Everyone!

God bless us everyone!

Saturday, December 22, 2007

The Surprise

Did you see it? Want to talk about it? The combox is awaiting for you!

I saw it and loved it. It brought back many good memories of the conference where it was performed. There were some new touches, especially the scenery; but also Dale's cockney accent seemed new.

I also noted some dubbing, and I wondered what that was all about. Especially at the end of Act One where the Poet, Oliver, says "My God! The Surprise!"--we noticed it was dubbed "Oh Yes! The Surprise!" or perhaps just "Yes! The Surprise!"

Dale and Mark were great as the guards, Dale's drunken performance was spot on with that gorgonzola cheese remark. Kevin O'Brien's performance was great, very believeable and natural, his acting abilities shine. Similarly, the Author, Jeremy? I think...gave a great performance.

The two lovely ladies, Ashley and Catherine, gave wonderfully good performances as the Princess and her lady in waiting, Donna Maria Margareta. And the prince, Julian, was regally handsome and swashbuckling in his swordplay.

What fun! I hope the person who agreed to tape it for me did tape it. But if you want to see it again (or missed it last night) it will be on EWTN again on Monday afternoon, Christmas Eve.
1PM EST
12PM CST
11AM Rocky
10AM Pacific

Friday, December 21, 2007

O Antiphons (con't)

O Radiant Dawn,
splendor of eternal light,
sun of justice:
come, shine on those who dwell
in darkness and the shadow of death.

Award for this Blog!

This blog is a runner up for the Catholic Blog Awards 2007-Best Group Blog award!

I guess the group is me and Dr. Thursday and YOU!

Congratulations Everyone!

The Surprise on EWTN tonight!

10 EST
9 CST
8 Rocky
7 Pacific
If you don't have cable, you can get it streaming live on EWTN, whether you have cable, broadband or the old fashioned dial-up.

Enjoy the show!

Thursday, December 20, 2007

O Antiphons (con't)

O Key of David,
O royal Power of Israel
controlling at your will the gate of heaven:
come, break down the prison walls of death
for those who dwell in darkness and the shadow of death;
and lead your captive people into freedom.

Thank you, Dr. Thursday.

Dr Thursday's Third Thursday in Advent Post


Three Thursdays of Advent - a Trinity of Christmas Truths:
3. The Shepherds (and the Angels)


again with a subtitle:

News - and not N's

That last character is not an English N, but the capital Greek "nu". For we shall start with a bit of language lesson today:
Angel, ankle, anchor, sphinx
Are joined by Chestertonian links
There, gamma gives us nu's effects
Preceding G, K, C, or X.
Of course the person who wrote that is not very Greek-literate, or he would have written the last line differently. It ought to say "preceding gamma, kappa, chi, or xi". But then he would have had to change the rhyme, and the rhythm... well, it does not pay to criticise a poet. Besides, it's fun to see that G, K, C there. Uh-oh.

Eee-oo, Eee-oo.
"Yes, ossifer, I was rhyming without a license again..."
"Pay your bail,
Or it's off to jail."

Ahem. (Sorry, I got carried away. Christmas, Greek, and so forth...) Yes, in Greek, a gamma before these four letters (gamma, kappa, chi, xi) has the effect of a nu, or at least a nasalizing. Ask your neighbourhood Greek scholar if you want to know more.

I bring up this odd little effect of the Greek gamma, because I hunted up the word "angel" in my splendid GIGANTIC copy of Liddell and Scott's Greek-English Lexicon. It weighs maybe 10 pounds, and is over 3.5 inches thick... whew! But as Greek scholars will point out, you will NOT find "angel" (OK, actually "angelos") if you hunt under alpha, nu, gamma... that's not how it's spelled. It's spelled aggeloV - that is, alpha, gamma, gamma, epsilon, lambda, omicron, sigma. Two gammas, but but it still sounds like angelos. It means, simply, "messenger" or "envoy". The related word angelia means "message", whether the substance (the information) or the conveyance (the media).

Why am I bothering about some abstruse detail about the word "angel" when I am supposed to be talking about the SHEPHERDS?

Well, partly because of what GKC pointed out about this matter. All too often, there is a loss of perspective in the matter of shepherds - especially when considered next to angels, which is where we really need to consider them:
...the more the artists learned of realism and perspective, the less they could depict at once the angels in the heavens and the shepherds on the hills, and the glory in the darkness that was under the hills.[GKC The Everlasting Man CW2:305]
Hence, if we really want to know more about the shepherds, we have to know more about the angels, and what it was that was happening, there in the fields, during the night shift. (No we are NOT going to see them dancing on the pinheads. Not today. There's a form to be filled out if you want that.)
Read more.
First, and it bears repeating - an "angel" is NOT simply a "kind" of being - it is a being who is holding, or carrying out an office - specifically a messenger. The correct term for them is "Spirit" - specifically Good Spirit, to distinguish from those we glimpsed last week. Even though we have some hints, we don't quite know how else they occupy themselves - it seems every time we see them they are delivering a message to somebody. Kind of God's FedEx. One place where it seems we catch them out-of-uniform was in the vision of Isaias:
And they [angels] cried one to another, and said: "Holy, holy, holy, the Lord God of hosts, all the earth is full of his glory." [Is 6:3]
Uh, oh. Nope. Read it again. It says they cried ONE TO ANOTHER. They're such perfect messengers when they're not busy, they keep in practice sending the same message over and over again to each other! And why not? The statement "The Lord God of hosts is holy, holy, holy" is perhaps the most sublime of all truths. It ought to be repeated. If we understood it - and angels, not having to bother with school and study and research and forgetting, and all that, certainly understand it. As I was saying, if we understood it, we would know it is not just a simple quibble like "2+2=4" or "the sun rises in the east" or whatever. For in this statement is contained infinite depth of truth which only God himself knows completely. Hence the angels, as they stand before him, gaze into this infinity and see more and more, and are moved to say it again and again, in utter and total joy. And there is no joy like the joy of satisfaction of grasping a truth!

Now, where do the shepherds come in?

Well. You see, there was this Roman poet Virgil. He wrote about shepherds, and country scenes. People had gotten citified with all that Roman stuff, and forgotten their roots: a simple people who worried about keeping their kitchen fire burning, their crops growing, their livestock increasing... Ah (you can imagine them sighing) back then we were HAPPY. Curious. The Latin word "felix" usually translated "happy" is derived from "fecund" - a crop-growing word - it first meant "fruitful". (It may be a shock to learn that fetus and female and related words come from the same root.) Virgil, as you may know, wrote a sequel to Homer (yeah, it's been happening for over 2000 years) called "The Aeneid". He also wrote a bunch of poems called the Bucolics, or Eclogues. (I always mix up if there are two sets or just two names.) One of these, the Fourth Eclogue, is perhaps the most famous poem in the world. I wrote about it previously, and GKC talks about it in our main reference (CW2:292, 307-8) But here I mention it not to explore it, but just to point out that the other big piece of the puzzle - the one not among our three present topics of study, which is Rome - was quite aware of a certain importance of shepherds - not just as the lowly people necessary if one wants wool and lambchops, but as forming an important element, and a simple (and HAPPY=felix) one, as part of the Roman thing.

There was also a Hebrew poet who we first hear about watching his sheep. He ended up getting another job - hard to say if it was a promotion, but he kept on writing poems in any case. One of the most famous of his poems is often quoted as a great prayer for peace, in which case either the quoter hasn't really read it, or he doesn't know much about life as a shepherd. I mean, of course, David, who later became King of Israel, and his psalm about how the Lord is his shepherd. It contains one of the most militant phrases in all the psalms: "For though I should walk in the midst of the shadow of death, I will fear no evils, for thou art with me. Thy rod and thy staff, they have comforted me." [PS 22(23):4] And this provides the critical link to our topic of last week: How on earth can a shepherd guarantee peace to his flock if he is unarmed? But our Lord is the Lord of Armies, the God of Battles. David fought with God's help, attained victory over the enemies of Israel (remember Goliath? There was a lot more after that) and established peace. He knew what being a shepherd required.

Now that we've reviewed these two items, we come to the shepherds who "were in the same country, keeping night watch" that night when Jesus was born. Here we could get into the discussion of how that means it wasn't winter, or how there could not be snow, etc., etc. I am not going to go there, except to mention how it snowed when Gilbert and Frances visited Jerusalem in 1919. [See The New Jerusalem CW20:238]

Recalling that GKC had actually been to the Holy Land, then, let us now hear how GKC considered the shepherds. He gets to the matter in one of his penetrating insights, which is tied in to our discussion previously about how Christmas is the "invasion" from Heaven. And, like the Hobbits, there's a riddle involved:
...in the riddle of Bethlehem it was heaven that was under the earth.

There is in that alone the touch of a revolution, as of the world turned upside down. It would be vain to attempt to say anything adequate, or anything new, about the change which this conception of a deity born like an outcast or even an outlaw had upon the whole conception of law and its duties to the poor and outcast. It is profoundly true to say that after that moment there could be no slaves. There could be and were people bearing that legal title until the Church was strong enough to weed them out, but there could be no more of the pagan repose in the mere advantage to the state of keeping it a servile state. Individuals became important, in a sense in which no instruments can be important. A man could not be a means to an end, at any rate to any other man's end. All this popular and fraternal element in the story has been rightly attached by tradition to the episode of the Shepherds; the hinds who found themselves talking face to face with the princes of heaven. But there is another aspect of the popular element as represented by the shepherds which has not perhaps been so fully developed; and which is more directly relevant here. Men of the people, like the shepherds, men of the popular tradition, had everywhere been the makers of the mythologies. It was they who had felt most directly, with least check or chill from philosophy or the corrupt cults of civilisation, the need we have already considered; the images that were adventures of the imagination; the mythology that was a sort of search; the tempting and tantalising hints of something half-human in nature; the dumb significance of seasons and special places. They had best understood that the soul of a landscape is a story and the soul of a story is a personality. But rationalism had already begun to rot away these really irrational though imaginative treasures of the peasant; even as systematic slavery had eaten the peasant out of house and home. Upon all such peasantries everywhere there was descending a dusk and twilight of disappointment, in the hour when these few men discovered what they sought. Everywhere else Arcadia was fading from the forest. Pan was dead and the shepherds were scattered like sheep. And though no man knew it, the hour was near which was to end and to fulfil all things; and though no man heard it, there was one far-off cry in an unknown tongue upon the heaving wilderness of the mountains. The shepherds had found their Shepherd.

And the thing they found was of a kind with the things they sought. The populace had been wrong in many things; but they had not been wrong in believing that holy things could have a habitation and that divinity need not disdain the limits of time and space. And the barbarian who conceived the crudest fancy about the sun being stolen and hidden in a box, or the wildest myth about the god being rescued and his enemy deceived with a stone, was nearer to the secret of the cave and knew more about the crisis of the world than all those in the circle of cities round the Mediterranean who had become content with cold abstractions or cosmopolitan generalisations; than all those who were spinning thinner and thinner threads of thought out of the transcendentalism of Plato or the orientalism of Pythagoras. The place that the shepherds found was not an academy or an abstract republic; it was not a place of myths allegorised or dissected or explained or explained away. It was a place of dreams come true. Since that hour no mythologies have been made in the world. Mythology is a search. We all know that the popular presentation of this popular story, in so many miracle plays and carols, has given to the shepherds the costume, the language, and the landscape of the separate English and European countrysides. We all know that one shepherd will talk in a Somerset dialect or another talk of driving his sheep from Conway towards the Clyde. Most of us know by this time how true is that error, how wise, how artistic, how intensely Christian and Catholic is that anachronism. [GKC The Everlasting Man CW2:305-7, emphasis added]
There is so much meat here I would be at it for several more pages, going further and further into all kinds of interesting matters, and yet still not talking about the one which motivated me in the beginning. That is, the one which links shepherds with angels and Nu's, I mean News.

And you may delight because of it, because you'll get to hear just a tiny bit about Subsidiarity, which I still hope to get completed.

You see, God himself did what he told us at the Last Supper when he washed the feet of the apostles, as he told his apostles: the Son of Man did not come to BE SERVED but TO SERVE.... [Mt 20:28]

And that means THERE MUST BE AN INVERSION OF THE GREAT HIERARCHY OF BEING.

At Christmas, the great secret - the most marvellous of all secrets, the secret of new life which is known only to pregnant women, God's own secret that "the Word is made flesh" is suddenly made known by direct view. Mary sees her newborn. Standing vigil at the cave-mouth, Joseph hears the infant cry and comes in when Mary calls him - he sees, and now he also knows.

BUT THIS IS GOOD NEWS - IT MUST BE MADE KNOWN.

The great sea-going writer, Admiral Samuel Eliot Morison, wrote one of the most priceless and most dramatic lines I have ever read in his book on Columbus, Admiral of the Ocean Sea. Speaking of that incredible night from October 11 to 12 in 1492, he wrote:
Not since the birth of Christ has there been a night so full of meaning for the human race.
Elsewhere, he tells of how Columbus, struck by a storm during the return journey, was in agony, copying out his logs and sealing them in casks, anxious that his news be spread even if he be lost... For the first rule of discovery is to LET SOMEONE KNOW WHAT YOU'VE DISCOVERED.

Likewise, the fundamental law of ALL science: it is not science until it is "published" - somehow it must be told to others.

So what did God do?

Immediately, the full armies of heaven are dispatched, songbooks in hand, to the fields near Bethlehem. Why? Hard to find someone lower than a tired, stinky, hungry, poor, bored, sleepy shepherd on a hillside of a little town.

But God knew where they were. And what does God do? He sent the whole army - a "great multitude of the heavenly host" - here "host" means army. And you don't send armies around unless they have orders.

Remember - no need to keep things secret any more. The plan has begun. So, (as said in another story of a Close Encounter) the Son came out at night and they sang to Him. (hee hee! Ahem.)

As usual the angels (being angelic, in the Greek sense!) had a message. Here it is:
"Fear not; for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy that shall be to all the people: for, this day is born to you a Saviour, who is Christ the Lord, in the city of David. And this shall be a sign unto you. You shall find the infant wrapped in swaddling clothes and laid in a manger." [Lk 2:10-12]
If the great joy is for all people, the only way that can happen is for them to be TOLD about it.

Now, the shepherds, not being fools, saw that this news story could easily be checked. All they had to do was go over to the town mangers (in the cave, you know, everybody knows where that is) and see if there was a newborn baby boy there...

But the critical line, you see, comes a little further down: "And all that heard wondered: and at those things that were told them by the shepherds." [Lk 2:18, emphasis added] Just a line further on, the Latin has the verb reversi sunt (they returned) - this provides a clue. It's as if the shepherds were REVERSED - in a manner of speaking, they had been promoted. The lowest are now doing the work of the highest. (Inversion of the hierarchy, you see.) They were now performing the office of messenger. Exalted above even the principalities and powers, these poor folk were now the angels, and their feet are beautiful on the mountains [Is. 52:7] bringing the Good News: a Baby is born in Bethlehem.
It is all that is in us but a brief tenderness that is there made eternal; all that means no more than a momentary softening that is in some strange fashion become a strengthening and a repose; it is the broken speech and the lost word that are made positive and suspended unbroken; as the strange kings fade into a far country and the mountains resound no more with the feet of the shepherds; and only the night and the cavern lie in fold upon fold over something more human than humanity. [GKC, The Everlasting Man CW2:317]
Let us hasten to the cavern, pray there, then take on our duty to proclaim this good news, singing like the angels, singing the joy of good news over and over, again and again:

Doxa in `uyistoiV Qeon kai epi ghV eirhnh en anqrwpois eudokiaV.

Gloria in excelsis Deo et in terra pax hominibus bonae voluntatis.

That is, "Glory in the highest to God and on Earth peace to men of good will."

A holy, merry, Chestertonian Christmas to all!

--Dr. Thursday


PS It strikes me, having read this over again, that there is a paradox between the Hobbit-like secret invasion and its news-flash reporting by angelic choir. Of course there's a paradox - we're talking about God-made-man here, what would you expect? Chesterton doesn't have a copyright on paradox, little buddy. God was quite aware of the leak, having lit up the star (whatever it really was!) as we saw previously - he knew he was drawing a line in the sand - or perhaps I should say on the Hill - and at the right time he would cross it. It was even so prophesied: "This child shall be a sign of contradiction..." [Lk 2:34] More on this some other time. But don't forget that Christmas is first and foremost a Mass - that is, a sacrifice. -- Dr. T.

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

O Antiphons (con't)

O Flower of Jesse's stem,
you have been raised up as a sign for all peoples;
kings stand silent in your presence;
the nations bow down in worship before you.
Come, let nothing keep you from coming to our aid.

Nov/Dec Gilbert Magazine

I had a chance to peruse the latest Gilbert today, and I enjoyed so many of the great articles I found there.

First, I have to say the opening editorial was great. But then, I was consulted on it (as the author of a book on Harry Potter, which included plenty of Chestertonian references). I was immediately drawn to the Aidan Mackey defense of Harry Potter, which I was pleased to read. Every time I read of another Chestertonian who understands the Potter books, I feel more reassured about writing my book. Aidan's article, "Plain Without a Sledgehammer", was something I could have written. My sentiments exactly.

I then looked at The Wise Men, an illustrated work by Beatrice Wilczynski. I enjoyed this work. I also noticed that sprinkled throughout the magazine, there were many little "The Three Wise Men" trivia bits, which I enjoyed reading and finding.

Next, I read Nick Milne's Harry Potter article, as I enjoy his work on line and since he's a previous Gilbert and Frances Scholarship winner, I knew he'd have something fascinating to say. And again, I felt I could say, my sentiments exactly. Another great article.

Then, since I've enjoyed James G. ("Gerry") Bruen, Jr.'s stories in the past, I skipped over to his "Terrific Tots" and found, once again, a modern Chestertonian article with a great punch line. This story idea is one I've actually had myself but never wrote, so I was glad to see Gerry do a great job of it. He actually made me feel sorry for Saundra's kids. Can I adopt them?!

Then, just because I always forget what I wrote, I read my review of Regina Doman's book, Waking Rose. I don't remember writing it that well, so I think some editor really improved it. ;-)

After that, because I am really a fan of Edward Chesterton's (partly because he was an amateur photographer, and I happen to like photographers, and partly because he was the father of someone I love), I enjoyed reading Dale Ahlquist's short article on Mr. Chesterton. I also had the idea while reading it that those scrap books could probably be found in some landfill in England somewhere, and someone should be looking for them. Someone should have run after the trash man, too. Yes, it is frustrating that Gilbert threw all those things away.

I forgot to mention that somewhere in there I read News with Views, because I always enjoy that feature.

More tomorrow.

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

O Antiphons (con't)


O Adonai, and Leader of the house of Israel, who didst appear unto Moses in the burning bush, and gavest to him the Law on Sinai: COME and redeem us by Thy outstretched arm.
Thanks to Dr. Thursday.

The Bohemian Catholic Likes our Latest Gilbert

You can read her post here and comment if you wish. I'm taking my Gilbert on the road with me today and hope to devour it while passing the pastoral scenes of southeastern Wisconsin on our way to Madison to put up a relative's tree.

Happy Tuesday! One week till Christmas!

Monday, December 17, 2007

O Antiphons Begin Today


O Sapientia: “O Wisdom, O holy Word of God, you govern all creation with your strong yet tender care. Come and show your people the way to salvation.” Isaiah had prophesied, “The spirit of the Lord shall rest upon him: a spirit of wisdom and of understanding, a spirit of counsel and of strength, a spirit of knowledge and fear of the Lord, and his delight shall be the fear of the Lord.” (11:2-3), and “Wonderful is His counsel and great is His wisdom.” (28:29).

This week in Chestertonian excitement

I have a date for Friday night.

It's in front of my computer.

The date is with my daughter.

We're planning on watching Chesterton's play "The Surprise" on EWTN.

It's on at 9pm CST.

I hope you will make a date for Friday night, too!

You can watch it Thursday, but in Central time, it's on at 4am. I don't plan to be up. ;-)

Welcome Italia!

The Italian Chesterton Society Blog is here. If you know Italian, you're good. If not, you'll need a translation page.

Saturday, December 15, 2007

Health


Health is a topic not often found on this blog.

Despite the fact that I am a Registered Nurse and quite interested in health, I also feel about it as Chesterton once wrote:
The trouble about always trying to preserve the health of the body is that it is so difficult to do it without destroying the health of the mind. Health is the most unhealthy of topics. GKC ILN, 8-10-1929
And being a nurse, I've seen it happen sometimes when someone has a health crisis, that they suddenly begin to focus unnaturally upon their own body and it does become, as Chesterton said, unhealthy. But, because a hospital stay encourages a person to focus on their body, it can sometimes, by its very nature as a health-inducing event, become an unhealthy (mind-wise) event. It takes real determination and force of will for the healthy (mind-wise) patient to re-balance after a health crisis back to a more unthinking habit of mind about health.

I hope I've made myself perfectly clear. I like health. I just don't want to talk about it. ;-)

Friday, December 14, 2007

My Gilbert arrived!

I have to admit, I haven't had an afternoon free yet to just sit down and read right through it.

I really like the cover. As you can see, it is the marvelous image of Gilbert gazing up at a star, perhaps he is meditating on the Star of Bethlehem. Anyway, because it's Christmas time, that's what I imagine. And swirling around the star, or emanating from it, are all these papers and letters, as if inspiration is coming to him just from gazing at the star.

The other way I see it is the letters and papers coming from Gilbert's head, going up to the star. Almost as if he is giving his writing to the Christ Child, and standing there free and child-like, emptying himself and offering everything to God, letting it all go.

I like that image because, as a writer too, I often get caught up in things that need doing, words that need writing, and forget To Whom I am Offering Everything. And sometimes, I am so busy staring at the papers (or the computer screen) that I forget to look up and see the Star.

This Christmas, my hope is that we will each take a little time to stare at the stars, and open our hearts to the coming of Christ. Let Him into your heart this Christmas, to be the Word, the strength, the whatever-it-is-you-need, to be the Love that you love with, the Faith that you believe with, the Hope that you hope in.

Only a few days remain, have a Blessed Advent.

Thursday, December 13, 2007

Thursday's Dr. Thursday

Three Thursdays of Advent - a Trinity of Christmas Truths:
2. The Other King Who Warred Upon the Children


Today's posting requires a subtitle:

Its Own Enemies Have Made It More Illustrious

This is, perhaps, not the kind of essay you would naturally read to children. Nor does it make good bedtime reading for Advent. It is quite a bit more horrifying than Marley's Ghost - or than pre-haunted Scrooge. Far worse than the Abominable Snow Monster of the North, more insidious than the pre-dawn Grinch.

But it is part of Christmas, and we avoid it to our dismay.

In order for me to talk about it, then, you will have to bear with a somewhat long-winded (who me?) and allusive manner of discourse. I have a lot to say about this topic, and it comes at an auspicious moment. But I do warn you - though I will NOT be explicit about all the details it will not be pleasant. But it is important.

In order to get to the matter at hand, let us begin with something exciting and happy - Advent's great Countdown to Christmas. There are two remarkable facts to note here.

The word "countdown" became popular with Man's venture into space, as the rocket-people measured the time until launch. But the very first countdown was actually a count-UP. It occurs in the exceedingly famous and prescient From the Earth to the Moon by Jules Verne, and measured the seconds until 22:46:40 - that is, 13 minutes and 20 seconds before 11PM on December 1 - the moment when the great cannon in Florida was fired, sending its capsule-shaped projectile towards the Moon!!!

Yes, the first count-UP ended not at zero, but at forty - a famous Biblical number. (Hmm.) However, long before Barbicane and J. T. Maston's computations. there was another form of countdown in use. In fact, the whole calendar of a whole great people was founded on a continual looking forward to... something. Strange to say, the moon played a role in it.

No it was NOT the Hebrews, Israelites, or Jews.
Read more.

Every so often in a village by a river in Italy, the king woke up in the morning and performed some unknown calculation, establishing how many days remained until the next full moon. He then called out the result of the computation, which probably had the effect of "Hey everybody! Our next big bash will come in 13 days!" (or whatever his calculations indicated). They liked parties, you see, and a full moon was as good a reason as any to have one.

As the little village became a great city, and the kingship gave way to a republic and other variations of governance, this "calling" of dates continued. The kingly chore of feast-announcing was maintained by a "priest", who announced the "Kalends" - the schedule of feasts which gives us our word "calendar". And though the Romans had months we can recognize, their days were numbered downwards: like children before Christmas, they were always looking forward to a future feast.

Alas. Now we have all the components - Rome, children, and Christmas - and we must attend, as GKC did for most of two chapters, to a dark and sad aspect of history, which has its continuance even today. I mean Carthage, child sacrifice, and Herod. I shall not summarize this here. You know quite well (or can read elsewhere) what happened in Carthage, and how Rome fought a losing battle to finally win - and the debate of WHY the Punic Wars happened (like why the American Civil War Between the States happened) will go on as long as Man has a history. GKC has been called wrong on this, as on other matters, and I shall not delve into that now. But he is right on its relation to the bigger picture - especially as it touches on the Christmas Story.

Last week we talked about the Magi, and the translation of that word. This week, we shall examine a far more mystical word. It is a word first heard from angels: "Sanctus, Sanctus, Sanctus, Dominus Sabaoth." [Isaias 6:3] This Hebrew word Sabaoth is translated in one edition of the Vulgate as "exercituum" - which gives us "Holy holy, holy, Lord of the armies".

At first this may seem irrelevant, but we must understand what is going on here, and run our mental focussing lenses all the way out, to give us the wide-screen view. Perhaps Chesterton can assist:
It is often said with a sneer that the God of Israel was only a God of Battles, “a mere barbaric Lord of Hosts” pitted in rivalry against other gods only as their envious foe. Well it is for the world that he was a God of Battles. Well it is for us that he was to all the rest only a rival and a foe. [Cf. Lk 2:34 and and Mt 10:34] In the ordinary way, it would have been only too easy for them to have achieved the desolate disaster of conceiving him as a friend.
[GKC The Everlasting Man CW2:228]
You see, there was a war going on, and God had already decided to fight on the losing side. (If you think I've missed something here, you'll have to read GKC's The Ball and the Cross: "The Cross cannot be defeated, for it is Defeat.")

Indeed! At Christmas God Himself took on aspects of the warrior. First, He took on our human form (as St. Paul sings so gloriously in Gal 4:4) - that is, a form capable of suffering and dying. (See more on this in Hebrews 10.) Life, as GKC might have said, is worth dying for.

Secondly, and far more relevant, He came as a scout, or an advance-guard, coming in secretly and subtly, to keep the Enemy from knowing what was going on:
By the very nature of the [Christmas] story the rejoicings in the cavern were rejoicings in a fortress or an outlaw's den; properly understood it is not unduly flippant to say they were rejoicings in a dug-out. It is not only true that such a subterranean chamber was a hiding-place from enemies; and that the enemies were already scouring the stony plain that lay above it like a sky. It is not only that the very horse-hoofs of Herod might in that sense have passed like thunder over the sunken head of Christ. It is also that there is in that image a true idea of an outpost, of a piercing through the rock and an entrance into an enemy territory. There is in this buried divinity an idea of undermining the world; of shaking the towers and palaces from below; even as Herod the great king felt that earthquake under him and swayed with his swaying palace.
[GKC The Everlasting Man CW2:313]
Doesn't this ring a bell? Perhaps you might recall a scene in Rivendell and Gandalf addressing the Hobbits: “This is the hour of the Shire-folk, when they arise from their quiet fields to shake the towers and counsels of the Great.” [JRRT The Lord of the Rings II:2, 288]

And indeed that is exactly what happened. But at the same time, the Enemy was still hard at work - in a word, it was witchcraft, not that of Oz, Merlin, or Hogwarts, not of the Istari or of the Emperor-Beyond-the-Sea, but real witchcraft, which is about attaining a godlike power over life: "People would understand better the popular fury against the witches, if they remembered that the malice most commonly attributed to them was preventing the birth of children." [GKC, The Everlasting Man CW2:254]

That is what happened in Carthage, the "New Town" of the Phoenicians. That is what, somehow, was stuck in the mind of the Idumean king Herod the Great - who rebuilt the Temple in Jerusalem. When the Magi came asking that puzzling riddle about the newborn King, Herod saw, in truth, how a baby could be a threat. And so he took action.

You can read about the next scene in St. Matthew, 2:16-18. It cannot be sanitized for the young. It ought not be sanitized for the young. There ARE enemies out there. They are deadly foes. They hate life, they hate light, and they especially hate children, and those who engender them, teach them, guard them and defend them. Let no one misunderstand that we are talking about a fairy tale here, even while I quote GKC about them: "The baby has known the dragon intimately ever since he had an imagination. What the fairy tale provides for him is a St. George to kill the dragon." [GKC, "The Red Angel" in Tremendous Trifles]

You see, every attempt by our enemies, full of hate, bitter, and dark as they are, only goes to demonstrate the truth of the power of God better and better. At this very moment, there is a great whine going around the E-cosmos about somebody's dark compasses. But even a broken compass points north twice a day! (hee hee) Aristotle wrote a lot of nonsense (I will not explore it here) but in the hand of Aquinas the reasoning power of ancient Greece "bowed low in adoration" and in essence witnessed the truth of the Sacraments. Today's broken compass, spinning its never-ending orbit, stops and points to the True Pole: it exalts the Chair of Peter, advancing John Paul II's request in Ut Unum Sint better than a whole college of theologians.

Why bring that up here? Well - why is Herod a part of Christmas?

Herod recognised the danger of a child, and sent soldiers against the dangerous infant - he killed a lot of babies, but failed to achieve his intentions. The same has happened to tyrants and such throughout the centuries. Long ago Tertullian wrote: "The blood of martyrs is the seed of the Church." Yes. That is the point. The Holy Innocents, whose feast comes on December 28, were martyrs - witnesses to Truth. And truth has an Enemy, the "ancient dragon" or serpent [Rv 12:9] who has been a liar, and a hater, from the beginning. Those of us who choose the light thereby oppose the dark, the lie, the hate - and so put ourselves at risk, along with the Baby of Bethlehem. And how can it be otherwise, as long as we continue to call upon the Thrice-Holy, the God of Battles?

With a strange rapidity, like the changes of a dream, the proportions of things seemed to change in their presence. Before most men knew what had happened, these few men were palpably present. They were important enough to be ignored. People became suddenly silent about them and walked stiffly past them. We see a new scene, in which the world has drawn its skirts away from these men and women and they stand in the centre of a great space like lepers. The scene changes again and the great space where they stand is overhung on every side with a cloud of witnesses [cf. Heb 12:1], interminable terraces full of faces looking down towards them intently; for strange things are happening to them. New tortures have been invented for the madmen who have brought good news. [cf. Is 52:7] That sad and weary society seems almost to find a new energy in establishing its first religious persecution. Nobody yet knows very clearly why that level world has thus lost its balance about the people in its midst; but they stand unnaturally still while the arena and the world seem to revolve round them. And there shone on them in that dark hour a light that has never been darkened; a white fire clinging to that group like an unearthly phosphorescence, blazing its track through the twilights of history and confounding every effort to confound it with the mists of mythology and theory; that shaft of light or lightning by which the world itself has struck and isolated and crowned it; by which its own enemies have made it more illustrious and its own critics have made it more inexplicable; the halo of hatred around the Church of God.
[GKC The Everlasting Man CW2:296-7]
Remember! "The issue is now quite clear. It is between light and darkness and every one must choose his side." [GKC, on his deathbed. in Ward's Gilbert Keith Chesterton 650]

Next week, we shall see another aspect of Rome - and of Israel - as we count down to the Great Feast of Christmas.

--Dr. Thursday

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Current Gilbert cover now on eBay


Gilbert's cover artist, Ben Hatke, has put the original art work from the cover of this month's Gilbert magazine up on eBay! If you liked this month's cover (and I've heard from many who do) you may want to help support a Gilbert artist and own a piece of beautiful artwork as well. Suitable for framing.

And if you love Ben's work, there are two more for sale which you can see on the Gilbert cover page, as well as these here.

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

For the Love of Literature

Today, my mail included Maureen's newest book, For the Love of Literature: Teaching Core Subjects with Literature. I am very excited to finally be able to hold this book in my hand.

Truth in advertising: I helped on this book. As Maureen states in her acknowledgements, I wrote some of the book descriptions, edited and helped in various other support roles (does coffee and hugs count? I think so.) on this book. However, it is still a book in which I wholeheartedly recommend, and I would even if I hadn't worked on it.

The reason is this book is so extremely practical and helpful to homeschoolers! And there is something I never knew in my previous readings of the book: how reader-friendly, and busy-mom-friendly it is. Because running down the side of the pages are shaded areas which announce the subject matter of that section. So, if you want math books, for example, you don't even need the Table of Contents. You can just thumb right to the "Math" section and quickly find a list of books.

I can't wait to take this book to my library. I want to start using it today. There are so many good book suggestions. Obviously, some of them you'll already know about, but I guarantee you there are books in there you've never heard of, and they are terrific books. And isn't that a wonderful thing, finding new terrific books?

Speaking of books, For the Love of Literature does something else that's wonderful: because it's written by a Catholic Homeschooling Mother (of Seven!), the Oldest of Whom is Almost Ready for College (read: experienced!), you can feel assured that this list only contains GOOD books. Books you will feel safe giving your children to read.

Now, if you don't have your Christmas list made out for yourself (and you really should, otherwise you know you're just going to get another pair of fuzzy slippers again for Christmas this year) add For the Love of Literature to your list and let your family know where to buy it: here. Do it quickly, Christmas is almost here.

At $12.95, it is a real bargain (it's thick!--255 pages of books, books, books!) for the amount of helpful information it contains. Tell the family to get priority shipping so it will come in time to get it under the tree. Merry Reading!

Monday, December 10, 2007

Fun and Games--Happy 2nd Anniversary ACS Blog!

Our second anniversary was on Saturday, December 8th, but, being the busy mother that I am, I forgot until today.

If you are interested in seeing our first post, read here. And our 1st anniversary post is here.

For our 2nd anniversary, I propose some fun and games. Prizes will be awarded when we can think of a good prize.

1. Create a good clerihew of either:
a) Father Brown
b) Gabriel Syme
c) Innocent Smith
d) Hudge and Gudge
e) Monsier Flambeau
or
f) Chesterton himself
g) Frances Blogg
h) Dale Ahlquist

Any and all clerihews/triolets/ballads may or may not be submitted to Gilbert magazine, depending on their ability to make us laugh.

2. Compose an anniversary triolet

3. Compose a Ballad of the 2nd Anniversary

4. Make sure to have a picnic on the floor or lunch on the roof, depending on the climate where you live. And even though the anniversary is officially past, you may have the picnic in honor of us anyway. Do it today!

5. Has there been a memorable post here that you easily recall, that had some sort of impact on you (good or bad)? Something particularly meaningful, or particularly funny? Let us know about it.

6. Who can name the two bits of produce that Chesterton's likeness has been reproduced on and reported on here on this blog?

Happy Anniversary!

Saturday, December 08, 2007

Update to Prayer Request

Thanks for the continued prayers. The individual in question has told us that the interview yesterday went well, though for the present must await further indications, but is also most grateful for our prayers and suggestions.

Friday, December 07, 2007

Chestertonian Literary Type Question

A Chestertonian student asks the following question:

In the essay "A Drama of Dolls" in GKC's Alarms and Discursions,
GKC talks about a certain old puppet-play he saw, supposedly the
original tale of Faust, translated into English.
Question: Does anyone know the title of this play, and whether it can be
found, in paper or electronic form?
(Note this apparently is NOT the version by Goethe.)

If anyone knows the answer, please e-mail me (Nancy). Thanks.

Thursday, December 06, 2007

Dr Thursday's First Thursday in Advent Post


Three Thursdays of Advent - a Trinity of Christmas Truths: 1. The Kings

Since in 2007 Advent is arranged so as to provide us with only three Thursdays, I have decided to take the ultimate GKC Christmas reference work - "The God in the Cave" from The Everlasting Man - and consider what GKC called "the trinity of truths symbolised here by the three types in the old Christmas story: the shepherds and the kings and that other king who warred upon the children." [CW2:316] Of course there are other ways of examining Christmas - there are countless ways - and while none of them shall really plunge to the depths of what really happened that night some 2000 years ago, it is part of the feast's true universality, not simply in its Chestertonian sense, that ALL of them happen to be true. The light, I mean the Light, pouring forth and radiating as from a great gemstone, is not lost in its fracturing - it is one of Dante's intangibles, and so is augmented. And each of us who take up the topic in our "hundred thousand hymns, carols, rhymes, rituals, pictures, poems, and popular sermons" [ibid CW2:301-2] by which that impossible "contrast between the cosmic creation and the little local infancy" is "repeated, reiterated, underlined, emphasised, exulted in, sung, shouted, roared, not to say howled" - each of us may have the satisfaction of being musicians in the Great Symphony of Christmas, where all who dare to play can give forth no dissonance.

And so, let us consider the Kings. (I must do them first as I can by no means treat Herod first, and I think it best to take Shepherds at the date closest to the Feast.)
Read more.

Who are these guys anyway? St. Matthew (chapter 2) calls them the "Magi". Most people, like GKC, call them "kings" or "Wise Men"; one modern translation calls them "astrologers". If we need to be modern, it would be far better to call them "scientists": the Bible text says very clearly "We observed his star in oriente". (The Greek and Latin term can be translated either "in the east" or "in rising".) Observed!!! Hmmm... astrologers concerned with the REAL sky? They are too busy with money, I mean charging people to tell about the future, crediting or blaming the poor wandering planets and the imaginary lines of the Zodiac. Never mind that no one is said to be born under the sign of Ophiuchus, though the sun definitely can be in that constellation, or that the twelve Zodiac constellations are hardly distributed evenly across the ecliptic, as reported in standard horoscopes. Never mind that the sun is still in Pisces at the Vernal Equinox - there are still some tie-dyed hippies with gray hair, swaying to the "Age of Aquarius" which is still over a century away. But people who actually look at the sky? Well, those of course have to be scientists, who are attentive to something real. If some of sky-watchers later went off and wrote silly predictions based on what they saw - who cares, whole reams of astronomers did that. (Another time we may explore this matter, as the history of science is most curious - think "phlogiston"!)

But why are they called "kings"? This is perhaps inferred from the fact that they brought royal treasures: gold, frankincense, and myrrh. Also possibly from the fact that they had a rapport of dignity with King Herod. (Common folk strutting into the palace to ask riddles of the King? Ha!) But even more likely, from the "Epiphany psalm", 71 in the Vulgate, 72 in the Hebrew numbering:
"The kings of Tharsis and the islands shall offer presents: the kings of the Arabians and of Saba shall bring gifts."
And there is also this prediction:
Arise, be enlightened, O Jerusalem: for thy light is come, and the glory of the Lord is risen upon thee. For behold darkness shall cover the earth, and a mist the people: but the Lord shall arise upon thee, and his glory shall be seen upon thee. And the Gentiles shall walk in thy light, and kings in the brightness of thy rising. Lift up thy eyes round about, and see: all these are gathered together, they are come to thee: thy sons shall come from afar, and thy daughters shall rise up at thy side. Then shalt thou see, and abound, and thy heart shall wonder and be enlarged, when the multitude of the sea shall be converted to thee, the strength of the Gentiles shall come to thee. The multitude of camels shall cover thee, the dromedaries of Madian and Epha: all they from Saba shall come, bringing gold and frankincense: and shewing forth praise to the Lord.
[Is 60, emphasis added. Note that the bit about the heart being enlarged comes up in the "Grinch" story, whose heart grew three sizes on Christmas Day.]
That quote even has something about observation: "Lift up thy eyes round about, and see"! Perhaps that is the best (and oldest) explanation of the use of "kings". The number "three" has all the numerological hints of mystery and reality, from the trisagion of Isaias 6:3 ("Holy holy holy") which we sing at Holy Mass to the triple-consonant roots of the Semitic languages, from the Trinity to the 64 entries in the Watson-Crick code by which DNA/RNA is translated into amino acids. But commentators explain it simply because St. Matthew names three gifts: gold, frankincense, and myrrh.

But if they are not (necessarily) kings, and are correctly called neither astrologers nor astronomers, what word should we use?

The Greek of St. Matthew uses the term "Magi" - the ancient word from Old Persian which also gives us "magic" - that is simply the "study" or discipline of the Magi. So perhaps we might say (with a bang on the table) that settles the Harry Potter debate. (hee hee) But really, the problem is simpler than that, though somehow connected. For the magic of the Magi was most likely neither sleight-of-hand (like a stage-magician) nor formal demonic invocation (which evil we give no references for). Neither was it simply a collection of superstitions, nor yet a compendium of science - but most likely an early hodge-podge of both, rather unfortunately hashed up and left unedited, since they had not yet had a true authority - an advisor, indeed a legal Advocate (or Paraclete, in the Greek) to come and assist them in their work.

Here I shall mention another word, sometimes scary in its use, but of no evil import in itself: the word "occult" - which simply means "hidden" (from claudere = to close or shut). Do not get mixed up here; this is not related to the word "cult" - another word with mixed senses - which comes from the root "to grow". When in the late 1600s Gilbert (I mean William Gilbert, not GKC!) wrote about the strange properties of amber (!) and of the strange stone of Magnesia, these things were considered occult. They, like Harry Potter's accio (Latin "I summon") caused the motion of things distant from themselves. Their forces were HIDDEN. No one knew how or why they worked. We now know somewhat more about them, though as our own Gilbert says, "we have to go on using the Greek name of amber as the only name of electricity because we have no notion what is the real name or nature of electricity." [The Common Man 170] You see, something "occult" is simply that - hidden. We use another Greek word, "mystery", which the Early Church used as we use "Sacrament" or "Eucharist" or even "Holy Mass" - to suggest something of a similar nature, and the word "mystery" can be just as liable to misunderstanding as "occult" can be. It is that sense of reversing that covering or hiding which gives us the opposite word, "detect" - with its derivatives "detection" and "detective" - and here we may possibly have the beginnings of a clue (sorry no pun intended) as to what the Magi were actually doing - though we must, at the same time, remember that there are things which are going to remain mysterious even when uncovered:
Mysticism keeps men sane. As long as you have mystery you have health; when you destroy mystery you create morbidity. The ordinary man has always been sane because the ordinary man has always been a mystic. He has permitted the twilight. He has always had one foot in earth and the other in fairyland. He has always left himself free to doubt his gods; but (unlike the agnostic of to-day) free also to believe in them. He has always cared more for truth than for consistency. If he saw two truths that seemed to contradict each other, he would take the two truths and the contradiction along with them. His spiritual sight is stereoscopic, like his physical sight: he sees two different pictures at once and yet sees all the better for that. ... The whole secret of mysticism is this: that man can understand everything by the help of what he does not understand. The morbid logician seeks to make everything lucid, and succeeds in making everything mysterious. The mystic allows one thing to be mysterious, and everything else becomes lucid.
[GKC Orthodoxy CW1:230-231]
OK, we've seen this important passage before, but how does this apply to the Magi and the Star? I will attempt to uncover a bit of the mystery.

People talk about this "Star of Bethlehem" as if it were something quite dramatic, something awesome, something utterly refulgent (fulgur=lightning) - a nova, a supernova, a rare conjunction of planets or of planets with bright stars. Perhaps. But it seems far more in keeping with the other parts of the Story to ponder a very different variation of quality.

Perhaps the dramatic truth of the Star was not its brilliance, but simply its location - its new appearance in that place! Perhaps it was, like the birth it heralded, something rather subtle. One had to be paying VERY CLOSE attention to the many stars of the ancient heavens in order to know whether they were the same from one night to the next - remember there was no amber-power - I mean electricity - and it was DARK at night. (Cf. the quote from Isaias above!) Obviously the common people knew, unlike we moderns, how there were some stars which "wandered" among the others, and so we still call them the Wanderers, though we say it in whittled-down Greek as "planets". But careful observers (the scientists, the wise, the Uncoverers?) might have seen something different - something NEW - that the Common Man might not have noticed.

Nor does this subtle, quiet, barely noticed astronomy become any less dramatic for the true scientist. There are so many examples of tiny, barely detected (note that word!) variations - which are no less important for being subtle: the proper motion of stars, the parallax of the "fixed stars", sunspots, the dark (or bright) lines in spectra... the list goes on and on. Indeed, with this idea, this part of the Gospel becomes a little more understandable. The scene of Herod's audience with the Magi changes to a much more human character. He asks for the "exact time of the star's appearance" - as if he's really saying, "Star? What star? (These Wise Guys say they saw a "new" star... yeah, sure.) Any of you see a new star? What star are they chattering on about? But just in case these Wise Guys are on to something, I'd better take steps..." Really - if there was something, star or planet or meteor - something obvious - out there to be seen, he would not have had to ask the Magi - he could have asked anyone. But perhaps, what the Magi saw was something subtle - something which only THEY saw, and only THEY interpreted. Something which spoke to them directly. But as true scientists, they acted on their discovery: they took almost incredibly expensive gifts and set off on an almost incredibly doubtful journey.

The thing we must remember is that their "research" found their desired result: they found the new-born king. He, like the star, was something subtle, something unexpected, something SMALL and NOT VERY SHINY, appearing in a place just about everyone else paid no attention to. But it was not at Herod's palace that they presented their gifts - outrageous gifts, symbolic gifts, gifts which may have meant the cessation of their own lifes, their research... gifts given to an Infant, asleep on His mother's lap! Later that Child would say to another, "Sell what you have and give it to the poor, then come and follow Me." They received a different order, to go back home another way. We know they did so, but we don't know anything more. Some stories tell that they were indeed Christians and went on to do the work of their Lord - their feast day is given in Butler's Lives of the Saints as July 23, and their bones are said to rest in the cathedral of Cologne, but no one can say more for certain.

What do the Magi and their work tell us today? How does such work apply to us living in a high-tech world 2000 years later? GKC tells us:
...they came out of orient lands, crowned with the majesty of kings and clothed with something of the mystery of magicians. That truth that is tradition has wisely remembered them almost as unknown quantities, as mysterious as their mysterious and melodious names: Melchior, Caspar, Balthazar. But there came with them all that world of wisdom that had watched the stars in Chaldea and the sun in Persia; and we shall not be wrong if we see in them the same curiosity that moves all the sages. They would stand for the same human ideal if their names had really been Confucius or Pythagoras or Plato. They were those who sought not tales but the truth of things; and since their thirst for truth was itself a thirst for God, they also have had their reward. [cf. Jn 7:37] But even in order to understand that reward, we must understand that for philosophy as much as mythology, that reward was the completion of the incomplete. Such learned men would doubtless have come, as these learned men did come, to find themselves confirmed in much that was true in their own traditions and right in their own reasoning. Confucius would have found a new foundation for the family in the very reversal of the Holy Family; Buddha would have looked upon a new renunciation, of stars rather than jewels and divinity than royalty. These learned men would still have the right to say, or rather a new right to say, that there was truth in their old teaching. But, after all, these learned men would have come to learn. They would have come to complete their conceptions with something they had not yet conceived; even to balance their imperfect universe with something they might once have contradicted. Buddha would have come from his impersonal paradise to worship a person. Confucius would have come from his temples of ancestor-worship to worship a child. ... Here it is the important point that the Magi, who stand for mysticism and philosophy, are truly conceived as seeking something new and even as finding something unexpected. That tense sense of crisis which still tingles in the Christmas story, and even in every Christmas celebration, accentuates the idea of a search and a discovery. The discovery is, in this case, truly a scientific discovery. For the other mystical figures in the miracle play, for the angel and the mother, the shepherds and the soldiers of Herod, there may be aspects both simpler and more supernatural, more elemental or more emotional. But the Wise Men must be seeking wisdom; and for them there must be a light also in the intellect. And this is the light: that the Catholic creed is catholic and that nothing else is catholic. [note: The Greek word “catholic” means “universal”] The philosophy of the Church is universal. The philosophy of the philosophers was not universal. Had Plato and Pythagoras and Aristotle stood for an instant in the light that came out of that little cave, they would have known that their own light was not universal. It is far from certain, indeed, that they did not know it already. Philosophy also, like mythology, had very much the air of a search. It is the realisation of this truth that gives its traditional majesty and mystery to the figures of the Three Kings; the discovery that religion is broader than philosophy and that this is the broadest of religions, contained within this narrow space. The Magicians were gazing at the strange pentacle with the human triangle reversed; and they have never come to the end of their calculations about it. For it is the paradox of that group in the cave, that while our emotions about it are of childish simplicity, our thoughts about it can branch with a never-ending complexity. And we can never reach the end even of our own ideas about the child who was a father and the mother who was a child.
[GKC The Everlasting Man CW2:308-9, 310-311]
The pentacle, or five-pointed star, is an old symbol of magic - but, as J. R. R. Tolkien explains in his book on Sir Gawain and the Green Knight it was ALSO a symbol of the five wounds of Christ, the five Joyful mysteries, and other fives of Christian lore. It is also to be noted that the pentacle here described had not five, but six points, formed of two equilateral triangles, one inverted - also called the "Star of David"; GKC has more on this earlier in the same book [CW2:186-7]. You may recall that we ourselves have previously seen that same symbol in our discussion on fractals, which also "branch with a never-ending complexity". Yes, for even mathematics has its place at Christmas, in order that every topic "from pork to pyrotechnics" will illustrate "the truth of the only true philosophy". [GKC The Thing CW3:189]

Next week we shall see about the "steps" Herod took as a reaction to the stellar discovery (whatever it really was) of the Magi.

--Dr. Thursday

Wednesday, December 05, 2007

Prayers working

Thanks to all of you praying for a blog reader who lost his job. He has an interview on Friday, so let's pray that it will work out if it should work out. I do find it amazing how quickly this has happened, and thank you to the people who wrote me and had ideas for this Chestertonian, it is much appreciated.

Tuesday, December 04, 2007

Love and Fables

In the most recent issue of Gilbert (the most recent which *I* have had delivered, --if only I could catch that Chestertonian mailman!-- which is the anniversary issue, all covered in silver) there is an essay entitled Love and Fables, which I enjoyed but considered it too short. I felt something was missing. So, as it read Illustrated London News, July 2, 1910, I decided to look it up and see if I could put the whole thing here for your consideration. Here it is:

I pointed out last week that our makers of ultramodern moralities (and

immoralities) do not really grasp how problematical a problem is.

They are not specially the people who see the difficulties of modern

life; rather, they are the people who do not see the difficulties. These

innovators make life insanely simple; making freedom or knowledge a

universal pill. I remarked it in connection with a clever book by Miss

Florence Farr, and took as an instance the proposition (which she

seemed to support) that marriage is good for the common herd, but

can be advantageously violated by special "experimenters" and

pioneers. Now, the weakness of this position is that it takes no

account of the problem of the disease of pride. It is easy enough to

say that weaker souls had better be guarded, but that we must give

freedom to Georges Sand or make exceptions for George Eliot. The

practical puzzle is this: that it is precisely the weakest sort of lady

novelist who thinks she is Georges Sand; it is precisely the silliest

woman who is sure she is George Eliot. It is the small soul that

is sure it is an exception; the large soul is only too proud to be the

rule. To advertise for exceptional people is to collect all the sulks and

sick fancies and futile ambitions of the earth. The good artist is he

who can be understood; it is the bad artist who is always

"misunderstood." In short, the great man is a man; it is always the

tenth-rate man who is the Superman. Read more.

But in Miss Farr's entertaining pages there was another instance of

the same thing which I had no space to mention last week. The writer

disposes of the difficult question of vows and bonds in love by

leaving out altogether the one extraordinary fact of experience on

which the whole matter turns. She again solves the problem by

assuming that it is not a problem. Concerning oaths of fidelity, etc.,

she writes: "We cannot trust ourselves to make a real love-knot unless

money or custom forces us to 'bear and forbear.' There is always the

lurking fear that we shall not be able to keep faith unless we swear

upon the Book. This is, of course, not true of young lovers. Every

first love is born free of tradition; indeed, not only is first love

innocent and valiant, but it sweeps aside all the wise laws it has been

taught, and burns away experience in its own light. The revelation is

so extraordinary, so unlike anything told by the poets, so absorbing,

that it is impossible to believe that the feeling can die out."

Now this is exactly as if some old naturalist settled the bat's place in

nature by saying boldly, "Bats do not fly." It is as if he solved the

problem of whales by bluntly declaring that whales live on land.

There is a problem of vows, as of bats and whales. What Miss Farr

says about it is quite lucid and explanatory; it simply happens to be

flatly untrue. It is not the fact that young lovers have no desire to

swear on the Book. They are always at it. It is not the fact that every

young love is born free of traditions about binding and promising,

about bonds and signatures and seals. On the contrary, lovers wallow

in the wildest pedantry and precision about these matters. They do the

craziest things to make their love legal and irrevocable. They tattoo

each other with promises; they cut into rocks and oaks with their

names and vows; they bury ridiculous things in ridiculous

places to be a witness against them; they bind each other with rings,

and inscribe each other in Bibles; if they are raving lunatics (which is

not untenable), they are mad solely on this idea of binding and on

nothing else. It is quite true that the tradition of their fathers and

mothers is in favour of fidelity; but it is emphatically not true that the

lovers merely follow it; they invent it anew. It is quite true that the

lovers feel their love eternal, and independent of oaths; but it is

emphatically not true that they do not desire to take the oaths. They

have a ravening thirst to take as many oaths as possible. Now this is

the paradox; this is the whole problem. It is not true, as Miss Farr

would have it, that young people feel free of vows, being confident of

constancy; while old people invent vows, having lost that confidence.

That would be much too simple; if that were so there would be no

problem at all. The startling but quite solid fact is that young people

are especially fierce in making fetters and final ties at the very

moment when they think them unnecessary. The time when they want

the vow is exactly the time when they do not need it. That is worth

thinking about.

Nearly all the fundamental facts of mankind are to be found in its

fables. And there is a singularly sane truth in all the old stories of the

monsters - such as centaurs, mermaids, sphinxes, and the rest. It will

be noted that in each of these the humanity, though imperfect in its

extent, is perfect in its quality. The mermaid is half a lady and half a

fish; but there is nothing fishy about the lady. A centaur is half a

gentleman and half a horse. But there is nothing horsey about the

gentleman. The centaur is a manly sort of man - up to a certain point.

The mermaid is a womanly woman - so far as she goes. The human

parts of the monsters are handsome, like heroes, or lovely, like

nymphs; their bestial appendages do not affect the full perfection of

their humanity - what there is of it. There is nothing humanly wrong

with the centaur, except that he rides a horse without a head. There is

nothing humanly wrong with the mermaid; Hood put a good comic

motto to his picture of a mermaid: "All's well that ends well." It

is, perhaps, quite true; it all depends which end. Those old wild

images included a crucial truth. Man is a monster. And he is all the

more a monster because one part of him is perfect. It is not true, as

the evolutionists say, that man moves perpetually up a slope from

imperfection to perfection, changing ceaselessly, so as to be suitable.

The immortal part of a man and the deadly part are jarringly distinct

and have always been. And the best proof of this is in such a case as

we have, considered - the case of the oaths of love.

A man's soul is as full of voices as a forest; there are ten thousand

tongues there like all the tongues of the trees: fancies, follies,

memories, madnesses, mysterious fears, and more mysterious hopes.

All the settlement and sane government of life consists in coming to

the conclusion that some of those voices have authority and others

not. You may have an impulse to fight your enemy or an impulse to

run away from him; a reason to serve your country or a reason to

betray it; a good idea for making sweets or a better idea for poisoning

them. The only test I know by which to judge one argument or

inspiration from another is ultimately this: that all the noble

necessities of man talk the language of eternity. When man is doing

the three or four things that he was sent on this earth to do, then he

speaks like one who shall live for ever. A man dying for his country

does not talk as if local preferences could change. Leonidas does not

say, "In my present mood, I prefer Sparta to Persia." William Tell

does not remark, "The Swiss civilisation, so far as I can yet see, is

superior to the Austrian." When men are making commonwealths,

they talk in terms of the absolute, and so they do when they are

making (however unconsciously) those smaller commonwealths which

are called families. There are in life certain immortal moments,

moments that have authority. Lovers are right to tattoo each other's

skins and cut each other's names about the world; they do belong to

each other in a more awful sense than they know.

Monday, December 03, 2007

Cover Art from the Father Brown Reader for sale on E-bay!


Help support a Chestertonian family and get a one-of-a-kind piece of art to boot!

Reagan and Chesterton

I've just heard that Reagan quoted Chesterton in his Christmas at the Whitehouse talk in 1981. He was heard to quote:
The world will never starve for want of wonders, but for want of wonder.
A good reminder to us during this Advent time of year.

Saturday, December 01, 2007

Random Chestertonian Quote

"All habits are bad habits," said Michael, with deadly calm. "Madness does not come by breaking out, but by giving in; by settling down in some dirty, little, self-repeating circle of ideas; by being tamed. You went mad about money, because you're an heiress."

"It's a lie," cried Rosamund furiously. "I never was mean about money."

"You were worse," said Michael, in a low voice, and yet violently. "You thought that other people were. You thought every man who came near you must be a fortune-hunter; you would not let yourself go and be sane; and now you're mad, and I'm mad; and serve us right."
Manalive, Chpater 3, G.K. Chesterton.